A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking while in the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found being not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may perhaps look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Statutory laws are Individuals created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. Though this variety of regulation strives to shape our society, giving rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any check here legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of law.

82 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

If a victim is shot at point-blank array, it could still be fair to infer that the accused meant death. However, that just isn't always the case.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time. Read more

Section 302 on the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject to your most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani regulation.

acquitted the appellants from the many charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight presented to any reported judgment could count on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[seven]

In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition for the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) on the Pakistan Constitution provides unique jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on future grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.